← Back to questions

Is it possible to interpret Surat An-Nisā':157 as allowing that Jesus was crucified?

Surah An-Nisaa, verse 157 explicitly states: And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. 4:157. This verse clearly asserts that Jesus was neither killed nor crucified, indicating that the perception of his crucifixion was merely an illusion or misinterpretation.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir explains that this verse addresses the claim of the Jews who believed they had killed Jesus. He emphasizes that Allah clarified this misconception, asserting that they did not achieve this act. Ibn Kathir notes that the confusion among those who witnessed the event points to a divine intervention that made it seem as though Jesus had been crucified, while in reality, he was spared from death.

On the other hand, Majma al-Bayan, in its Shia commentary, reinforces this interpretation by asserting that the phrase indicates God raised Jesus to Himself and that he was neither crucified nor killed. It further notes that the accounts of the Jews and Christians about the crucifixion are based on appearances, which do not reflect the actual event, thus emphasizing God's authority in the matter.

In light of these interpretations from both Sunni and Shia perspectives, it is clear that the predominant understanding of this verse does not support the notion that Jesus was crucified. Instead, it asserts that the event was misperceived, reinforcing the idea that Jesus was protected by divine will. Therefore, interpreting this verse as allowing for the possibility of Jesus being crucified contradicts the explicit wording and the consensus among Islamic scholars on the matter.

Sources

Answers are generated and checked automatically; they may still be incomplete or imperfect. For religious rulings, consult a qualified scholar.

Ask your own question →